As a single guy in his twenties I can categorically say I hold some less than savory or otherwise unhygienic practices. I am guilty of eating my dinner over the kitchen sink. I don’t really believe in using glasses for my orange juice upon general principal. I’ve ingested moldy bread. The other night I discovered a practice that while not the worst in the world is one that I can’t quite get behind. It is done by men and women who you’d probably never expect. This is a practice that is so polarizing it can be debated as fiercely as abortion, troop support or whether Lady Gaga has a penis. It seems more than a simple life choice, it’s a veritable lifestyle. Last night I was introduced to the world of flushing.
Apparently a certain contingent of people deem it socially acceptable to flush leftover food down the toilet rather than putting it in the garbage. There are many arguments in support of flushing; some of which actually seem logical. For many it is a matter of convenience. Some flushers argue that due to a lack of a garbage disposal it is only appropriate to dispose of their otherwise rotten edibles via the toilet. Others cite that they may not have to take out their trash at the point of the food disposal. Rather than their trash bins reeking of spoiled food until their trash is full they literally flush it down the drain. Others claim they just don’t feel like putting pants on to take the garbage out. While this last one is a little weak I can relate. Sometimes you just don’t want to put on pants.
Those who are against flushing argue the practice is disgusting and an act of sheer laziness. A non-flusher argued even if you live on the fifth floor of an building with stairs resembling the vertical face of Everest, you have to leave sometime and that is when you should take your trash – and subsequently your rotten food – out to the dumpster. Others claim the toilet is a receptacle for flushing your bowels and bladder and therefore draining two-week old leftovers in it is unacceptable. As my friend and non-flusher put it, “It’s just something I never thought to do. I mean, it’s a place for shit!”
I wanted a better understanding of just what the flushers were willing to drop down their drains. I got everything from chicken noodle soup to fried rice. I asked if they’d be willing to flush anything with a more solid base – say pulled pork or Italian beef, perhaps some old sausage links. The general response was summed up best by my friend and flusher Sean. “We all know shit like that doesn’t go bad, if it’s pulled pork you make damn sure you finish it.”
I took this to mean essentially flushers dispose mainly of the forgotten or otherwise aperitif type foods that one doesn’t necessarily eat as an entire meal. In the case of the soup it’s more of a build up for the actual meal. In the case of the fried rice it’s the type of food that guarantees you’ll be hungry twenty minutes after consuming your fill. They seem to have an understanding for the essentialness of finishing hearty meals. They are just more willing to dispose of the liquid or loosely based food products into the commode.
Personally I have never flushed any food-based product down the toilet. I get queasy dumping dirty mop water in the thing. The act of dumping something other than my own excrement into the bowl just reminds me of vomiting and for me that’s more revolting than Pat Robertson. I think that’s mostly why I fall on the side of being an ardent non-flusher. That and it seems to me flushers are constantly tempting their own fate. Toilets back up easily enough as it is. And when they do whatever is clogged in there – be it week-old Pad Thai or a digested pot roast – is coming back up. In an attempt to be physically economical flushers are potentially making additional and otherwise unnecessary work for themselves. Plus it’s the worst kind of work. It’s the kind that involves poop. And as Jon Stewart said when referring to Paul Rudd’s bout with food poisoning, “That shit’s like lava. You don’t want any part of that.”
Glenn seems to think it goes deeper. He believes all flushers are inherently Republican. He told me this on our way home from the after-hours men’s club, also known as a Monday night at Underbar, where this great debate took place. He believes that the fervor with which flushers defend their practices translates to radical idealism. Under no circumstances are they willing to see another side of the issue. Further they will make anyone a flusher, even those who try it and decide it’s not for them. He feels that a flusher’s theory is that if one flushes, even once, one is by definition a flusher. This inevitably construes their numbers and gives them false confidence and a faulty platform by which to spout their position from.
I’m not sure if I whole heartedly believe with Glenn on this point but at the very least I think it goes to show how much of an issue flushing can become. I guarantee if you bring it up in your circle of friends at least a few will undoubtedly confess to the practice. You may never reach a consensus or even an understanding for one another but I promise you’ll see them in a new light. As I’m finding with my friends that’s not necessarily a bad thing. If nothing else I’ll cross my fingers next time I flush their toilets.
Thanks for your time.